The idea that businesses cannot have religious
liberty protections because they are not individuals or nonprofits is "total bunk," Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said.
In an interview with The Christian Post, Hatch explained that the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which was sponsored by him
back in 1993, was meant for everyone, including business
"[RFRA was] meant to protect everybody and businesses are
important as well. If we can impose corrupt or wrong rules on
businesses, that would spread corrupt or wrong rules throughout the country," said Hatch.
"Business should have to live up to these principles and we
ought to respect businesses that do."
Hatch's comments come in response to the claims by some that
businesses should not be given religious exemptions from laws
like the Health and Human Services Department's "preventive
On Wednesday, the Senate failed, along party lines, to move
forward a bill, S. 2578, which would have rewritten parts of
RFRA by mandating that businesses cover certain "preventive
services." It also would have overturmed the recent Supreme
Court decision exempting some businesses from the mandate
whose owners object on religious grounds. In a five to four
decision, the Court declared that companies like Hobby Lobby, a
family-owned company whose owners religiously object to
providing a few of the birth control methods mandated by the
Department of Health and Human Services, should be exempted
from providing them in accordance with RFRA.
Sen. Hatch told CP Congress has become more political than it
was when RFRA was first passed with overwhelming support
from Democrats and Republicans.
Hatch, along with multiple groups present at a press conference
at the "Senate Swamp" on Capitol Hill, felt that S. 2578 attacked
RFRA and religious freedom in general.
"Look at the way Congress is right now," said Hatch, whose
comments came Wednesday morning after the press conference.
"The current leadership on the Democratic side wants to play
politics a little … they're so afraid they might lose the Senate this
time and naturally I hope they do because it's time for a
RFRA was passed in 1993 with a vote of 97 to 3 in the Senate.
During the process, Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy became a
cosponsor for the legislation.
Hatch said "it was not an easy thing to get Senator Kennedy" to
support RFRA at first, "but once I really got into it with him he
saw the value of it."
"He came on, became one of the biggest supporters and was
down there at the South Lawn [of the White House] with me
when President Clinton signed it," explained Hatch.
In response to the decision, Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.)
sponsored S. 2578, which was also called the "Protect Women's
Health From Corporate Interference Act of 2014."
Multiple faith groups, including the Union of Orthodox Jewish
Congregations of America, the United States Conference of
Catholic Bishops, and the National Association of Evangelicals,
were at the press conference that took place before the bill was
Speakers included Sen. Hatch, Senator Lamar Alexander (R-
Tenn.), World Vision spokeswoman Cynthia Colin, and Melissa
Swearingen, associate director of Government Relations for
Nathan J. Diament, executive director for public policy at the
Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, gave the
introductory remarks and presented some of the speakers.
"The faith communities we represent have different views with
regard to contraception … some of us find that permissible, some
of us find it unacceptable," said Diament.
"What we all agree upon is the fundamental principle that after
the most compelling circumstances no American should be
forced to violate their religious beliefs."
S. 2578 was not without its supporters. Americans United for
Separation of Church and State, which has been critical of the
Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby decision, supports the proposed
The Reverend Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans
United, said in a statement released last week that Murray's bill
"is a good first step."
"The Supreme Court thoroughly botched the Hobby Lobby case
and has distorted the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in
pursuit of a reactionary agenda … It's up to Congress to set
things right," said Lynn.
"The reality is that the use of birth control is widespread. It's a
vital component of women's health care. No alleged 'religious
freedom' right of a corporation should trump that."